Talk:Lukhelia

Your claim that the Lukhi are related to both the Chukchi and the Inuit doesn't really make sense, linguistically speaking. The Chukchi are Chukotko-Kamchatkan (great word for galgje :P) while the Inuit are Eskimo-Aleut :P --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 19:42, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Geographically speaking, though, they're the major groups closest to Lukhelia. :P 77topaz (talk) 23:48, November 4, 2014 (UTC)

And how is that supposed to imply any kind of linguistic or genetic relation? :P --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 06:41, November 5, 2014 (UTC)

I didn't mean that the Chukchi and Inuit themselves are related. I meant that, due to their geographical locations, both of them could have settled Lukhelia, contributing to the population there - what is now the Lukhi. 77topaz (talk) 07:56, November 5, 2014 (UTC)

So it's uncertain to whom they're related, but it's thought they could be related to the Chukchi, the Inuit or the Cornevachi. Then write that instead :P --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 14:28, November 5, 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean there. Perhaps you misunderstood me again - my "both of them could have settled" comment was from an OOC perspective. 77topaz (talk) 03:45, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

If you don't want yourself to be misunderstood, it might be a good idea to say what you mean rather than something else. What I said is that they could be related to either (or neither, or both if they're a mix :P), but nobody knows for sure :P --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 06:47, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

I thought you would be able to understand mine as an OOC comment since this is just a talk page. But, your "nobody knows for sure" comment, do you mean that IC or OOC? 77topaz (talk) 23:34, November 6, 2014 (UTC)

IC :o --QytokantFRÅGOR??? 06:37, November 7, 2014 (UTC)